Free is a purchase price. It is not an operating cost.
How Much Does That Free Website Cost You Every Month?
Your website may have cost nothing to build.
That does not mean it costs nothing to operate.
The relevant question is not what you paid for it. It is what you are paying because of it.
The Invoice Said Zero
Corporate built it.
The agency included it.
The platform came with it.
The expense was absorbed years ago.
In conventional accounting, the website may appear fully paid for.
In acquisition accounting, its cost is assessed again every time purchased demand attempts to reach it.
A Free Asset Can Produce an Expensive Loss
If a company purchases $200,000 a month in traffic, the destination receiving that traffic is part of the acquisition system.
When prospective customers leave before the proposition becomes usable, the money did not disappear from the media invoice.
It disappeared between the click and the arrival.
The most expensive website you own may be the one you did not pay for.
How Much Does That “Free” Website Cost You Every Month?
Your website may already be paid for.
Your lost customers are not.
Enter a public URL to run the current mobile Lighthouse analysis.
Your website cost:$0
Estimated annual cost of keeping it:$1,048,421
Still think the expensive option is replacing it?
Model, not guarantee. The analysis uses a Lighthouse lab measurement and Nova’s modeled arrival curve. The economic estimate applies the recoverable arrival gap to the portion of paid-media spend assigned to the tested page. Change every assumption. Use conservative inputs. Validate any decision against campaign, analytics, CRM, and revenue data.
You Would Not Ignore a $90,000 Monthly Expense
A recurring software invoice receives an owner, a budget, and a review.
A recurring acquisition loss can remain invisible because nobody sends an invoice for customers who never arrived.
A loss does not become free because it never appeared as a line item.
Do Not Tell Them They Are Wrong. Let Them Test the Cost.
The calculator is not designed to win an argument.
It is designed to expose the consequence of assumptions the user controls.
Do not like Nova’s numbers?
Lower the traffic share. Reduce the spend. Raise the current arrival estimate. Make every assumption as conservative as necessary.
Now tell us the problem is not worth fixing.
The Cost of Change Must Be Compared With the Cost of Staying
Organizations often compare the price of new acquisition infrastructure with the remembered price of the existing website.
That is the wrong comparison.
The relevant comparison is the cost of intervention against the continuing economic exposure of the current condition.
Continue accepting its measured and modeled acquisition loss.
Measure whether improved arrival produces enough economic return to justify expansion.
Your website was free. Your customers were not.